<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Van Til and Barth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reformedforum.org/ctc010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reformedforum.org/ctc010/</link>
	<description>Reformed Theology New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/ctc010/#comment-10257</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-10257</guid>
		<description>I know this is audio on Van Til, but if you are going to highlight Van Til&#039;s disagreement with Barth, it would be helpful if you actually engaged within the debate. How is Barth&#039;s theology so hostile to Reformed thought? What are the implications of this disagreement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is audio on Van Til, but if you are going to highlight Van Til&#8217;s disagreement with Barth, it would be helpful if you actually engaged within the debate. How is Barth&#8217;s theology so hostile to Reformed thought? What are the implications of this disagreement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Barth?</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/ctc010/#comment-9110</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Barth?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-9110</guid>
		<description>[...] read that Cornelius Van Til was the first theologian to sound the alarm on Barth, and I came across this audio link (I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s good, nor if it&#039;s still up...I&#039;m at work with no sound).  This pdf looks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read that Cornelius Van Til was the first theologian to sound the alarm on Barth, and I came across this audio link (I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s good, nor if it&#8217;s still up&#8230;I&#8217;m at work with no sound).  This pdf looks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/ctc010/#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-9030</guid>
		<description>Do any of you have copies (audio or hard copy) of Bruce McCormack acknowledging that Van Til read Barth correctly?

I&#039;m currently involved in a small reading group with a Barthian who brought T.F. Torrance&#039;s essay &quot;Theological Persuasion&quot; from the book &quot;God &amp; Rationality&quot; for us to read today.  It is good for me because I have never been forced to interact with Barth or his intellectual children.  But understanding neo-orthdoxy/crisis theology well enough to interact responsibly with it is difficult.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  I&#039;m trying to read Van Til&#039;s two books on Barth, but it is slow going.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do any of you have copies (audio or hard copy) of Bruce McCormack acknowledging that Van Til read Barth correctly?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently involved in a small reading group with a Barthian who brought T.F. Torrance&#8217;s essay &#8220;Theological Persuasion&#8221; from the book &#8220;God &amp; Rationality&#8221; for us to read today.  It is good for me because I have never been forced to interact with Barth or his intellectual children.  But understanding neo-orthdoxy/crisis theology well enough to interact responsibly with it is difficult.  Any help you could offer would be much appreciated.  I&#8217;m trying to read Van Til&#8217;s two books on Barth, but it is slow going.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
