<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rf="http://reformedforum.org/api"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Grace, Natural Law and Eschatology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reformedforum.org/ctc120/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc120/</link>
	<description>Reformed Theology Podcasts, Videos, Blogs and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy A.</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc120/#comment-17432</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reformedforum.org/?p=1118#comment-17432</guid>
		<description>I also thought it interesting that Kloosterman said that the Noahic Cov was &quot;thoroughly redemptive&quot;.

Wilson&#039;s take on Common Grace was certainly unique - but he did bring up a good point about the &quot;back-bone&quot; of grace. I think that Van Til&#039;s emphasis on antithesis and the role of cg in making a distinction is the better rout to go, but it does not address specifically the examples Wilson brought up. 

I am finding it interesting how between subjects I tend to side with different men. Will I be more confused at the end of this - I wonder??

Thanks again for the great program!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also thought it interesting that Kloosterman said that the Noahic Cov was &#8220;thoroughly redemptive&#8221;.</p>
<p>Wilson&#8217;s take on Common Grace was certainly unique &#8211; but he did bring up a good point about the &#8220;back-bone&#8221; of grace. I think that Van Til&#8217;s emphasis on antithesis and the role of cg in making a distinction is the better rout to go, but it does not address specifically the examples Wilson brought up. </p>
<p>I am finding it interesting how between subjects I tend to side with different men. Will I be more confused at the end of this &#8211; I wonder??</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great program!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camden Bucey</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc120/#comment-17322</link>
		<dc:creator>Camden Bucey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reformedforum.org/?p=1118#comment-17322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never heard anyone present a dual-sanction model to common grace as Doug Wilson did.  I thought the differences on common grace were very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard anyone present a dual-sanction model to common grace as Doug Wilson did.  I thought the differences on common grace were very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

