If so, it seems to me having now read Bahnsen’s essay that Bahnsen’s arguments and claims were treated very shoddily in this episode. Bahnsen in this essay denies some of the positions attributed to postmillennialism in this essay (for example, when Riddlebarger implies that postmillennialism teaches that sin won’t exist in the millennial age), and the sense in with Bahnsen talks about amillennialism being pessimistic is not the same sense Riddlebarger claims Bahnsen means it, in fact, Riddlebarger seems to agreed with Bahnsen’s sense (e.g. by being pessimistic that the gospel will have an evident effect on human governments).

As postmillennialism and amillennialism are the two positions I struggle with and jump between, I would greatly appreciate an episode dedicated to just those positions, with both sides being fairly represented, even if the show were just Riddlebarger invited back solely to give the positive case for amillennialism over postmillennialism. While it makes sense to focus on premillennialism and dispensationalism given their larger demographic and the huge differences when compared to the a-/postmillennial position; still, it seems nearly impossible to find more than a drive by critique of postmillennialism vs amillennialism from either side, and I greatly crave a more detailed and in depth discussion of the two.