People often speak of the “cross” synecdochally, that is, referring to the entire work of redemption accomplished by Christ. While this is perfectly acceptable, repeated use of this construction can under-emphasize the significance of the resurrection. In this episode, the resurrection is displayed within the context of redemptive-history and its bearing upon the benefits of salvation is demonstrated as the panelists discuss many of the works of Richard B. Gaffin, Jr.
Links
- Resurrection and Redemption: A Study in Paul’s Soteriology
- Theonomy and Eschatology: Some Reflections on Postmillennialism
Participants: Camden Bucey, Jared Oliphint, Jeff Waddington
Browse more episodes from this program and learn how to subscribe.
Here is the link to Gaffin’s “Biblical Theology and the Westminster Standards”: http://beginningwithmoses.org/bt-articles/188/biblical-theology-and-the-westminster-standards
Thanks for this episode!
I have often felt that the resurrection needs a greater emphasis in the vocabulary of the church. However, I am beginning to think that neither ‘cross’ or ‘resurrection’ captured the full-orbed vocabulary the church should embrace. I am thinking that “Christ’s person and work” is the only terminology that does the trick. Sure its a bit longer than ‘resurrection’ or ‘cross’ – but I like how it gives light to more than simply the redemption accomplished but also brings out the redeemer too.