<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rf="http://reformedforum.org/api"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pentecostal Movement from 30,000 Feet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reformedforum.org/the-pentecostal-movement-from-30000-feet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reformedforum.org/the-pentecostal-movement-from-30000-feet/</link>
	<description>Reformed Theology Podcasts, Videos, Blogs and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/the-pentecostal-movement-from-30000-feet/#comment-20464</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reformedforum.org/?p=600#comment-20464</guid>
		<description>I think the issue why it is seems so legitimate is because historic cessationism can&#039;t be defended exegetically and you have to hold many presuppositions and read them into texts in order to make a consistent case.  It is just much easier and, I think, Biblically faithful to hold the D.A. Carson view of &#039;&#039;open but cautious&#039;&#039; keep the emphasis on preaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue why it is seems so legitimate is because historic cessationism can&#8217;t be defended exegetically and you have to hold many presuppositions and read them into texts in order to make a consistent case.  It is just much easier and, I think, Biblically faithful to hold the D.A. Carson view of &#8221;open but cautious&#8221; keep the emphasis on preaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McDowell</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/the-pentecostal-movement-from-30000-feet/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reformedforum.org/?p=600#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>Are today&#039;s (or Twentieth Century) pentecostalists the spiritual children of those tagged &quot;enthusiasts&quot; or &quot;SchwÃ¤rmerei&quot; by Luther? Or how about their relationship to Montanism?

It&#039;s my impression (unencumbered by any theological education) that most of the whacky/ heretical trends hitting the Church today is essentially re-packaged stuff from the first few centuries AD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are today&#8217;s (or Twentieth Century) pentecostalists the spiritual children of those tagged &#8220;enthusiasts&#8221; or &#8220;SchwÃ¤rmerei&#8221; by Luther? Or how about their relationship to Montanism?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my impression (unencumbered by any theological education) that most of the whacky/ heretical trends hitting the Church today is essentially re-packaged stuff from the first few centuries AD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Belder</title>
		<link>http://reformedforum.org/the-pentecostal-movement-from-30000-feet/#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Belder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reformedforum.org/?p=600#comment-7959</guid>
		<description>Good post, Camden.  I&#039;ve always been perplexed by Pentecostalism&#039;s attraction and its rapid growth.  I think you&#039;ve summed it up well by tagging it as more conservative and simple.  I think another part of it is a relatively attractive piety and the idea of being filled with the Spirit in such a dramatic and &#039;powerful&#039; way.  When it comes to Jenkins&#039; predictions, I always have mixed feelingsâ€”yes, the Church is growing, but what flavor of Pentecostalism is going to become dominant?  Are we going to see an expansion of liberation theology-influenced Pentecostalism that&#039;s characteristic of Latin America?  Will the strange blend of legalistic/fundamentalist Pentecostalism that characterizes more of the American southeast?  I suppose time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Camden.  I&#8217;ve always been perplexed by Pentecostalism&#8217;s attraction and its rapid growth.  I think you&#8217;ve summed it up well by tagging it as more conservative and simple.  I think another part of it is a relatively attractive piety and the idea of being filled with the Spirit in such a dramatic and &#8216;powerful&#8217; way.  When it comes to Jenkins&#8217; predictions, I always have mixed feelingsâ€”yes, the Church is growing, but what flavor of Pentecostalism is going to become dominant?  Are we going to see an expansion of liberation theology-influenced Pentecostalism that&#8217;s characteristic of Latin America?  Will the strange blend of legalistic/fundamentalist Pentecostalism that characterizes more of the American southeast?  I suppose time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

