Comments on: Biblical Natural Law
https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/
Reformed Theological ResourcesMon, 30 Jul 2012 18:10:16 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2
By: Rob deRoos
https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85792
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:10:16 +0000http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85792Jim,
I think a more significant book by Matthew Levering is his book, “Scripture and Metaphysics: Aquinas and the Renewal of Trinitarian Theology” published in 2004 by Blackwell. I reason I think this significant is that the problem in the current milieu seems to be either an entire truncation of metaphysical concerns in ST and BT along with an exuberant interest in narrative without any sense of traditional metaphysical/traditional doctrinal mooring in less than sound orientations to theology. Or in sound orientations to theology, they may get the Creator/creature distinction correct, but there tends to be an interest in RH yet with a reluctance, either by way of lack of interest or lack of sophistication, to relate it or connect it to creation and providence.
]]>
By: Jim Cassidy
https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85665
Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:26:34 +0000http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85665Thanks, Jordan, that is helpful to know!
]]>
By: Jordan
https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85648
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:25:00 +0000http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85648Thanks for noting this work. One of the reasons it doesn’t deal with VanDrunen’s work on natural law in the two kingdoms is that this latest release is a paperback version of a book that originally appeared in hardcover in 2008.
]]>