Comments on: Biblical Natural Law https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/ Reformed Theological Resources Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:10:16 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Rob deRoos https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85792 Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:10:16 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85792 Jim,
I think a more significant book by Matthew Levering is his book, “Scripture and Metaphysics: Aquinas and the Renewal of Trinitarian Theology” published in 2004 by Blackwell. I reason I think this significant is that the problem in the current milieu seems to be either an entire truncation of metaphysical concerns in ST and BT along with an exuberant interest in narrative without any sense of traditional metaphysical/traditional doctrinal mooring in less than sound orientations to theology. Or in sound orientations to theology, they may get the Creator/creature distinction correct, but there tends to be an interest in RH yet with a reluctance, either by way of lack of interest or lack of sophistication, to relate it or connect it to creation and providence.

]]>
By: Jim Cassidy https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85665 Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:26:34 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85665 Thanks, Jordan, that is helpful to know!

]]>
By: Jordan https://reformedforum.org/biblical-natural-law/#comment-85648 Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:25:00 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=2218#comment-85648 Thanks for noting this work. One of the reasons it doesn’t deal with VanDrunen’s work on natural law in the two kingdoms is that this latest release is a paperback version of a book that originally appeared in hardcover in 2008.

]]>