Using Kline as a weapon against Christians pointing out *unrepentant* sin. Interesting. Can’t really blame this on Michael Horton and company (as an aside)…

Notice the word I wrote before homosexual. Again: *unrepentant.*

And I’m not so sure your characterization of MacCulloch’s attitude vis-a-vis his homsexuality and his church is so on-the-mark. From what I gather he is *frustrated* that his church won’t accept homosexuality. Won’t downgrade from the direct and clear teaching of the word of God.

And, one more time, look at that word unrepentant. It’s an important word.

That is: You write as if you dwell in an Intrusion-Bubble

My keyboard must be possesed!

If the Wikipedia article is to be trusted, D. MacCulloch at least has the correct historic perspective and integrity to know that his personal orientation does not square with historic, orthodox Christianity, and he is not agitating for the ordination of practicing homosexuals.

You write as you dewll in an Intrusion-Bubble, by which you expect to deal in the hre & now as if the Final Judgement has come in fullness.

[Not that I would dream of igniting a 2-K debate here, Camden]

In my experience when you actually engage such sources and influences they turn out to, if just subtly, present things the way the Devil wants them presented. Not all propaganda of the Devil is written in crayon and blinking like a neon sign over a brothel.

Does that make MacCulloch’s historical description and insights on this subject invalid?