Comments on: Meditative Thoughts on Good Works https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/ Reformed Theological Resources Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:52:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Camden Bucey https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/#comment-2281390 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:52:08 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=3860#comment-2281390 In reply to Tim.

Go to the “Documents” section and create a new “Reading List.” It gives you a bunch of options for customizing it. I set a due date on Hodge for December 31 and read Tuesday through Saturday. It handles the rest.

]]> By: Tim https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/#comment-2273344 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:21:16 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=3860#comment-2273344 Be curious to see your customized reading plan and how you did it Logos.

]]> By: Justin https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/#comment-2272876 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:21:13 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=3860#comment-2272876 In reply to Mark R.

Mark G,

Thanks for pointing that one out. I’ll check it out!

]]> By: Mark R https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/#comment-2272151 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:16:52 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=3860#comment-2272151 In reply to Justin.

Justin — Be sure to check out Episode 200, which radically changed how I approach the whole Justification/Sanctification discussion. The most valuable insight for me was Lane Tipton calling “Union with Chirst” as the “Alpha point” from which our Justification and Sanctification simultaneously find their origin. This corrected my thinking in thinking that Sanctification follows Justification in some sort of vague succession

]]> By: Justin https://reformedforum.org/meditative-thoughts-good-works/#comment-2271968 Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:47:00 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=3860#comment-2271968 It would be nice to see Reformed Forum take on the topic of “Good works” and “sanctification” and maybe even how it relates to assurance head on. Maybe get representatives from each perspective. Maybe I am out of place in suggesting such a thing, but it is such a hotly debated subject, and it seems like everyone is talking past one another, without any concern of whether or not the bruised reed is broken. I don’t think Reformed Forum is guilty of this, and it seems like it would be a lovely medium to have a couple of representatives discuss/debate it.

Perhaps my perspective is incorrect, and if so, I would happily be corrected. But the issue doesn’t seem to be as clear as either side is making it out to be. This is a hard topic, and it would be encouraging (especially to young laymen like myself) to see people respect the topic enough to discuss it.

Again, I apologize if this comment is out of place, and I thank God for the resources you guys have provided! They have been very beneficial and edifying!

In Christ,

Justin

]]>