Comments on: Van Til and Barth https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/ Reformed Theological Resources Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:44:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 By: Clark and Van Til on Barth, Part 2. | A Place for Thoughts https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-3529901 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:06:04 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-3529901 […] 8 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/ctc10/ minute 21. […]

]]> By: John Bugay https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-3461833 Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:25:28 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-3461833 I have an edition of “Christianity and Barthianism” dated 1962. It was stated in the podcast that this work was from 1968.

]]> By: Dealing With Christomonism https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-53373 Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:31:11 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-53373 […] Van Til and Barth – ReformedForum.org. Here is the Reformed Forum on Van Til's critique of Barth. James PCA Jacksonville, FL My blog: […]

]]> By: Todd https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-10257 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:16:33 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-10257 I know this is audio on Van Til, but if you are going to highlight Van Til’s disagreement with Barth, it would be helpful if you actually engaged within the debate. How is Barth’s theology so hostile to Reformed thought? What are the implications of this disagreement?

]]> By: Karl Barth? https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-9110 Thu, 21 May 2009 12:52:06 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-9110 […] read that Cornelius Van Til was the first theologian to sound the alarm on Barth, and I came across this audio link (I don’t know if it’s good, nor if it’s still up…I’m at work with no sound). This pdf looks […]

]]> By: Chris https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc10/#comment-9030 Thu, 07 May 2009 18:18:14 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/ctc010/#comment-9030 Do any of you have copies (audio or hard copy) of Bruce McCormack acknowledging that Van Til read Barth correctly?

I’m currently involved in a small reading group with a Barthian who brought T.F. Torrance’s essay “Theological Persuasion” from the book “God & Rationality” for us to read today. It is good for me because I have never been forced to interact with Barth or his intellectual children. But understanding neo-orthdoxy/crisis theology well enough to interact responsibly with it is difficult. Any help you could offer would be much appreciated. I’m trying to read Van Til’s two books on Barth, but it is slow going.

Thanks

]]>