Comments on: Dennison’s Response

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:54:40 +0000

In reply to Chris Caughey. I think it is safe to say that this is the closest we will find to Kline's view among the four contributors. Kline was a Vos/VanTillian through and through. So I would argue this is Kline's view.

By: Austin Brown

Austin Brown — Sat, 22 May 2010 02:45:06 +0000

I’m a fan of your site/work, and a big fan of this particular series. Bravo! It’s a great idea and has been executed very well. I review and recommend Christian audio lectures, debates, interviews, podcasts, etc., and I want you to know that I’m going to plug your stuff (and have).

Your hard work is much appreciated! And thanks again for the provocative series.

Austin Brown

By: Camden Bucey

Camden Bucey — Mon, 17 May 2010 21:17:03 +0000

Just to be clear, the ordering among the 2nd round responses is arbitrary. I recorded with each person independently. At the time of the second round recordings, each participant had heard all the 1st round recordings and nothing else.

By: Troy Lizenby

Troy Lizenby — Mon, 17 May 2010 20:27:53 +0000

I don’t know if professor Dennison drew the short straw, but delivering the first response can make one feel somewhat at a disadvantage. However, I found his response surprisingly refreshing, insightful, and helpful in laying out the issues involved. I look forward to the other respondents, especially on how they deal with his emphasis on discontinuities between the two ages.

By: Chris Caughey

Chris Caughey — Mon, 17 May 2010 20:15:40 +0000

I appreciate Bill, but I sure wish Kline’s view had been represented in this discussion/debate.