Comments on: Jonathan Edwards’s Apologetic https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/ Reformed Theological Resources Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:47:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Jonathan Edwards’s Apologetic « Blogmatics https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-51782 Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:38:04 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-51782 […] Forum did an audio interview with Smart that you may want to listen to. You can find the audio here. Enjoy! Share […]

]]>
By: Jeff Downs https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-48439 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:33:25 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-48439 You may know this already, but we have Stephen Nichols addressing Edward’s apologetic here and his practice here.

]]>
By: Thomas Sullivan https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-47297 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:34:49 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-47297 In reply to Camden Bucey.

Camden: Thanks for the Heads Up on Hart’s work. I respect him highly and learn from him always, but I sure am glad to have purchased Smart’s work on this subject, I just got it yesterday. Helps to live in the same city as Heritage Books.

]]>
By: Jeffrey Waddington https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-46085 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:09:28 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-46085 Chris

I stand by my characterization of Chauncy. I do not think you can so neatly disconnect his criticisms of the revival from where he eventually landed. This is not to accept everything that happened in the revival. I have rad the Chauncy material and am not impressed. Chauncy’s idea of spirituality is reasonableness.

]]>
By: Chris E https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-46066 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:41:25 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-46066 Banner of Truth do sterling work in many ways, but I think their support for Edwards has to be read alongside their support of a particular type of 20th century British evangelism. When I read their work on Edwards, he starts to sound like a 17th century version of MLJ.

I think it was a bit unfair cast Chauncy’s arguments as – implicitly – that of a Unitarian. The critique of Edwards doesn’t necessarily slide off into heterodoxy.

]]>
By: joseph https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-45831 Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:44:38 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-45831 I agree with Iain Murray’s beliefs, but as a historian he is not a critical historian. Hart has his bias also but he is a far more capable historian.

This was the greatest episode of Christ the Centre I believe.

]]>
By: Camden Bucey https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-45651 Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:10:39 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-45651 Thanks Thomas. You may [or may not!] be interested in Darryl Hart’s interview on the OPC 75th anniversary. It is scheduled for publication in about two weeks. He gets into a bit of his Old Side views.

]]>
By: Thomas Sullivan https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc182/#comment-45633 Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:54:30 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1645#comment-45633 This was quite an interesting discussion, I will definitely look for his book. When mention is made of “mentalists” view of the Great Awakening, it seems that Daryl Hart, Mark Noll, and R. Scott Clark, make me nervous regarding their assessments of the Great Awakening. I love to listen to them to learn about Presbyterian history, but I trust Iain Murray far more as a historian of the Great Awakening. I wish Dr. Smart would have went into more detail about his concerns about the Gospel Coalition. I have always wondered if their evangelism and views of the “regulative principle” would have concerned good men like Jonathan Edwards.
By the way, I am adding my narration of the Sereno Dwight’s Life of J. Edwards to my podcast this week. Jeff W’s comments are always enlightening, you men have my respect as scholars! Thomas – Grand Rapids, MI

]]>