Comments on: An Approach to Church History

By: Don Haflich

Don Haflich — Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:09:00 +0000

In reply to Jim Cassidy. I only see one good thing in that list but maybe that's because I am biased towards Old Princeton.

By: Anar

Anar — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:32:47 +0000

In reply to Charles Williams. Thanks! This is a great new show. It is like a serial novel; at the end of each episode, I'm craving more. Keep up the good work Charles and Jonathan!

By: Charles Williams

Charles Williams — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:47:35 +0000

In reply to Anar.

Sure thing, Anar!

1. 70 AD – the Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem
2. 313 AD – the Edict of Milan
3. 325 AD – the Council of Nicaea
4. 381 AD – the Council of Constantinople
5. 431 AD – the Council of Ephesus
6. 451 AD – the Council of Chalcedon

By: Anar

Anar — Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:09:51 +0000

Are those mile marker dates listed somewhere? I didn’t take notes as I listened and have forgotten some already.

By: Mark A. Winder

Mark A. Winder — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:31:44 +0000

I appreciate the way you guys laid this out. Too often folks (including me) can be intimidated by the many hundreds of important dates in church history. Perhaps too often our initial approach is hampered by our sense of obligation that we examine the stem and vein of every leaf. It is helpful and essential for maintaining proper perspective, to begin with the whole forest. Your approach of marking significant dates and using them as reference points is a helpful way of maintaining perspective and flow. I hope this broadcast removed some of the impediments to studying church history. I think you have whet some appetites!

By: Jim Cassidy

Jim Cassidy — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:10:46 +0000

Well, since you asked . . .

The Boss
Count Basie
Old Princeton
Einstein
Thomas Edison
THe Sopranos

Sorry, counldn’t resist that last one!