Comments on: Thomas’ First Way http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/pft9/ Reformed Theological Resources Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:35:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 By: "Philosophy for Theologians" on Aquinas and Other Topics | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/pft9/#comment-53656 Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:25:15 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1322#comment-53656 […] On Thomas’s “First Way.” On Thomas’s “Second Way.” […]

]]> By: Jared http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/pft9/#comment-22824 Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:31:56 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1322#comment-22824 In reply to G. Kyle Essary.

Haha you’re completely right. I fully admit I’m not as aware of Thomistic thinking and categories as I should be. We’ve talked about this offline before – Bob’s strength is medieval philosophy, Jonathan’s is post-Kantian continental, and mine is 20th and 21st century analytic. But we all know Van Til. 🙂

]]> By: G. Kyle Essary http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/pft9/#comment-22813 Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:22:37 +0000 http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/?p=1322#comment-22813 I’ve gotta say that it was somewhat humorous how everyone was basically silent (except for Bob) during the first half, but when he started quoting Bavinck and Van Til, it turned into an African-American church type atmosphere with all of the “Right!” “Exactly!” and “Amen!” from the rest of you guys. Not that I disagree, but I still found it funny…

]]>