Thanks so much for the encouraging review! Patrick, my goal was to reproduce CVT’s philosophy of fact specifically in terms of the organic connection he sees from the simplest idea of factuality all the way back to the Triune God and the doctrine of creation. I think if the triune theological foundation of CVT’s approach to facts is made clear, his claim that only Christian facts are possible presents itself; and that claim is the foundation of his transcendental argument. I lay out Locke’s evidentialism as a comparison, first, because it sounds, at least initially, so plausible, but also because it is such a perfect test case for CVT”s critiques of evidentialism and thus such a perfect foil to CVT’s approach to facts and evidence.

Camden asked me more than once to come on the program to talk about CVT and evidence, and I kept standing him up. Maybe I’ll be banned from Reformed Forum or suspended indefinitely…

Thanks again