Comments on: Baptism — Listener Questions https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/ Reformed Theological Resources Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:24:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Robert McKenzie https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532996 Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:24:49 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532996 In reply to C. J. Fang.

Covenantal Baptism is a good term, although I don’t think it will clear up any confusion. Most confusion over infant baptism is because the person confused is unwilling to understand the other person’s position, but I like the term and Dr. Strawbridge’s book is excellent.

]]>
By: C. J. Fang https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532974 Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:45:02 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532974 I think the Presbyterian infant baptism should be called “covenantal baptism”. It will clear lots of confusion.

]]>
By: Adrian Clark https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532874 Sun, 01 Oct 2017 14:05:11 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532874 From Bristol England, thanks.

]]>
By: Rob McKenzie https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532724 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:35:43 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532724 In reply to Timothy Joseph.

Hello Tim, thanks for the comment. Forgive us if we have treated the scriptures without care, that was not our intention. I am not quite sure how we belittled the baptism of Jesus. His baptism is not the same as the Christian Churches and therefore is not an example that can be used to justify full immersion. That was our primary point. The reason why an ordained minister/elder are to be the ones who administer the sacraments is because they are the one who have been called by God to be the representatives of Christ in an official visible church function. This would also be the case regarding official church discipline. They have been given the keys of the kingdom with which they govern with authority. In the same way only those ordained to the ministry are to preach the word. I hope this clarifies our meaning. Thanks for pointing out our lack of clarity.
Rob

]]>
By: Timothy Joseph https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532709 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:33:58 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532709 The idea that baptismos is wash belies your theology determining your practice, rather than the range of meaning of the word as specified by the context. Your belittling the baptism of Jesus as an example of Christian baptism is unworthy of any Protestant.
Again, where in scriptural requirement for an ordained minister being necessary for baptism to be effective?
I love your show and appreciate your tradition, but was disappointed with the cavalier way you addressed the scripture related to the immersion tradition within Reformed movement.

Tim

]]>
By: Robert McKenzie https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532687 Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:13:29 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532687 In reply to Patrick Harvey.

Thanks for the encouragement, glad the episode was helpful. I was driving across California this week for work and enjoyed listening to the Catholic radio station. The host was doing a great job defending the reality of the God of the Bible as he debated someone advocating the Big Bang origin of the Universe. Of course I cringed when he started to pray to Mary. Thanks again.
Rob

]]>
By: Patrick Harvey https://reformedforum.org/podcasts/tsp90/#comment-3532678 Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:55:21 +0000 http://reformedforum.org/?p=6303#comment-3532678 Thanks for another great episode guys, always enjoyable! Your summary of what constitutes a valid baptism was especially helpful (minister, trinitarian, water), as a “now-Reformed-ex-Roman-Catholic” I have always had an interest of Roman Catholic theology and the most faithful way to understand and interpret that communion (especially in light of Galatians 1:8) …..Lord bless your ministries

]]>