Comments on: Shorter Catechism: Questions 1-10 http://reformedforum.org/questions-1-10-3/ Reformed Theological Resources Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:45:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Camden Bucey http://reformedforum.org/questions-1-10-3/#comment-9362 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:45:40 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/2008/01/29/questions-1-10-3/#comment-9362 In reply to charlie arehart.

Thanks for the note. I just fixed the contact form. We were having some issues with the site and disabled it to do some troubleshooting. I forgot to turn it back on.

As far as the feed goes, the website currently limits our RSS feeds to 10 items. We used to include more, but were having timeout issues because our server has been under quite a bit of stress. I’ll see if we can fix that since we’re running a little smoother now.

]]>
By: charlie arehart http://reformedforum.org/questions-1-10-3/#comment-9358 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:21:50 +0000 http://www.castlechurch.org/2008/01/29/questions-1-10-3/#comment-9358 Folks, thanks so much for all you do, and for this Catechism podcast especially.

But do you realize that the feed for this as a podcast (at http://feeds.feedburner.com/shortercatechism) is cutting off at questions 11-20? It does not offer this set of questions 1-10. Fortunately, I was able to find them here, but those who are given only the feed URL may be confused.

It may be a simple matter of configuring either this site (since it too shows this entry on a “page 2”) or the feedburner site to show all 11 episodes.

BTW, you wonder why I am commenting here rather than offering an email via the contact form (http://reformedforum.wpengine.com/contact/). Sadly, that page seems in error and does not (as of today) have any form on it for sending contact (we see only the “advertising” section, as tested in two different browsers.) Hope that’s helpful. Feel free to delete this last paragraph if you do fix that problem, so it doesn’t confuse future readers.

I do hope we get email notification if someone else comments here to address if the feed issue is addressed. Thanks again.

]]>