Comments on: It Is There and It Should Not Be Silent: Van Til’s Critique of Schaeffer

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:13:46 +0000

Along the line of Tim’s question, the following is a review by Schaeffer of an article on presuppositionalism, presumably dealing with Buswell’s review of Van Til:

http://www.pcahistory.org/documents/schaefferreview.html

By: Tai Wong

Tai Wong — Fri, 22 Mar 2013 03:21:47 +0000

I only know of Conrelius via his writings, whereas I know of Fran as a friend and a faithful one in the advance of the Gospel. It is not wrong that these men might differ in certain points and approaches, as we need watchmen and prayer warriors in the Kingdom so there are many other roles that we are to occupy for His Highest. I see no divisions in their devotion to our King of Kings. Thank you for your editorial work and most helpful dovetailing of the material. May others speak so kindly and well to our good and that of the work for His Highest.

By: tim sutherland

tim sutherland — Fri, 22 Mar 2013 03:17:53 +0000

I am just a ordinary layman .But just finished reading Classical apologetics a rational defense of the Christian faith and a critique of presuppositional apologetics .They also praised van till ,but also brought him to task . I am just starting to educate myself on presuppositionalism having in the past ,only hearing ligioner theology . Wondering if Shaeffer is middle ground ,between the two camps . just a novice have read a little schaeffer not much . thank you