Comments on: The Nature and Use of Apologetic Evidences

By: SLIMJIM

SLIMJIM — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:23:40 +0000

By the way, good show you guys, I finally got around to listening to it in my drive around town today

By: SLIMJIM

SLIMJIM — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:22:58 +0000

In reply to Mike.

Hey Mike,
I don’t want to be mean but I didn’t find Thom Nataro’s Van Til & the Use of Evidence helpful in articulating a Van Tillian philosophy of evidence; the basic point seems to me that Nataro was demonstrating how Van Til isn’t against evidence per se. But that’s my opinion.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:19:38 +0000

In reply to Jeff Downs. Thanks Jeff. I'd got the spelling completely wrong, no wonder I couldn't find it! A bit pricey over here though.

By: Jeff Downs

Jeff Downs — Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:47:48 +0000

In reply to Mike. Mike, The book Camden mention is Thom Nataro's Van Til & the Use of Evidence.

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 08 Jul 2013 05:55:26 +0000

Hi Camden, you mentioned a book at the start by Tom …. that you read at a football game. Could you give some details of this it sounds like a helpful read.

Thanks for all you work – much appreciated.