We discuss how a return to sola scriptura through confessional Reformed theology spares us from the errors of Roman Catholicism and modernism. Reformed covenant theology,
Perhaps you will remember from the last post, according to Jenson, Israel’s hope, as well as our own, is for participation in God’s own reality,
In our last post, (a while back!) I argued that Jenson had in fact compromised the creator creature distinction and I said that we would
In the last post we asked if Jenson had gone beyond Barth. Has he temporalized eternity? Jenson is certainly bolder in his assertions linking eternity
Thus far in this series we have looked at the life of Barth as well as begin to explore his theology as well. In particular
This is the third part of a four part series on the life and thought of Karl Barth. After completing a brief biography, we now
In our previous post, part 1, we introduced our thesis and opened with the beginning of Barth’s life. We pick up here with his years
In our last post we left two questions begging to be asked. First, how can Jenson talk about ontological truth statements in Scripture? Second, how
By now it should be understood by the reader that for Jenson, God is the act of utterance.[1] For Jenson, as I argued in my
I stated my basic contention in the last post. It was simply this, Robert Jenson, adopting Barth’s theological notion of time and eternity and taking
We discuss how a return to sola scriptura through confessional Reformed theology spares us from the errors of Roman Catholicism and modernism. Reformed covenant theology,
Perhaps you will remember from the last post, according to Jenson, Israel’s hope, as well as our own, is for participation in God’s own reality,
In our last post, (a while back!) I argued that Jenson had in fact compromised the creator creature distinction and I said that we would
In the last post we asked if Jenson had gone beyond Barth. Has he temporalized eternity? Jenson is certainly bolder in his assertions linking eternity
Thus far in this series we have looked at the life of Barth as well as begin to explore his theology as well. In particular
This is the third part of a four part series on the life and thought of Karl Barth. After completing a brief biography, we now
In our previous post, part 1, we introduced our thesis and opened with the beginning of Barth’s life. We pick up here with his years
In our last post we left two questions begging to be asked. First, how can Jenson talk about ontological truth statements in Scripture? Second, how
By now it should be understood by the reader that for Jenson, God is the act of utterance.[1] For Jenson, as I argued in my
I stated my basic contention in the last post. It was simply this, Robert Jenson, adopting Barth’s theological notion of time and eternity and taking
Receive notifications about forthcoming events, publications, and other updates. You may also subscribe to our print newsletter.
On behalf of Reformed Forum, I am pleased to announce that our Board of Directors has appointed Dr. Lane G. Tipton as Fellow of Biblical
Alan D. Strange, Imputation of the Active Obedience of Christ in the Westminster Standards. Explorations in Reformed Confessional Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books,
I often receive questions about Barth’s views on the Bible, which admittedly is a challenging topic. According to Karl Barth, the Bible is not revelation.
At the end of the year, I find it rewarding to reflect upon the books I read that year. Whether they be old favorites or
Reformed Forum
115 Commerce Dr.
Suite E
Grayslake, IL 60030
+1 847.986.6140
mail@reformedforum.org
